Posts in "Articles"

Like Captured Fireflies

by John Steinbeck

My eleven-year-old son came to me recently and in a tone of patient suffering, asked, “How much longer do I have to go to school?”

“About fifteen years,” I said.

“Oh! Lord,” he said despondently.

“Do I have to?”

“I’m afraid so. It’s terrible and I’m not going to try to tell you it isn’t. But I can tell you this—if you are very lucky, you may find a teacher and that is a wonderful thing.”

“Did you find one?”

It is customary for adults to forget how hard and dull and long school is. The learning by memory all the basic things one must know is the most incredible and unending effort. Learning to read is probably the most difficult and revolutionary thing that happens to the human brain and if you don’ t believe that, watch an illiterate adult try to do it. School is not easy, and it is not for the most part very fun, but then if you are very lucky, you may find a teacher. Three real teachers in a lifetime is the very best of luck. My first was a science and math teacher in high school, my second a professor of creative writing at Stanford and my third was my friend and partner Ed Ricketts.

I have come to believe that a great teacher is a great artist and that there are as few as there are any other great artists. It might even be the greatest of the arts since the medium is the human mind and spirit.

My three had these things in common: They all loved what they were doing. They did not tell—they catalyzed a burning desire to know. Under their influence, the horizons sprung wide and fear went away, and the unknown became knowable. But most important of all, the truth, that dangerous stuff, became beautiful and very precious.

I shall speak only of my first teacher because in addition to the other things, she brought discovery. She aroused us to shouting, book waving discussions. She had the noisiest class in school, and she didn’t even seem to know it. We could never stick to the subject, geometry or the chanted recitation of the memorized phyla. Our speculation ranged the world. She breathed curiosity into us so that we brought in facts or truths shielded in our hands like captured fireflies.

She was fired and perhaps rightly so, for failing to teach the fundamentals. Such things must be learned. But she left a passion in us for the pure knowable world and me she inflamed with a curiosity which has never left me. I could not do simple arithmetic but through her I sensed that abstract mathematics was very like music. When she was removed, a sadness came over us, but the light did not go out. She left her signature on us, the literature of the teacher who writes on minds. I have had many teachers who told me soon-forgotten facts but only three who created in me a new thing, a new attitude and a new hunger. I suppose that to a large extent I am the unsigned manuscript of that high school teacher. What deathless power lies in the hands of such a person.

I can tell my son who looks forward with horror to fifteen years of drudgery that somewhere in the dusty dark a magic may happen that will light up the years…if he is very lucky.

I used to lead tours at a plantation. You won’t believe the questions I got about slavery, by Margaret Biser

Up until about a year ago, I worked at a historic site in the South that included an old house and a nearby plantation. My job was to lead tours and tell guests about the people who made plantations possible: the slaves.

The site I worked at most frequently had more than 100 enslaved workers associated with it— 27 people serving the household alone, outnumbering the home’s three white residents by a factor of nine. Yet many guests who visited the house and took the tour reacted with hostility to hearing a presentation that focused more on the slaves than on the owners.

Film Review Aggregators

Movie review aggregators have gained tremendous influence over the decision of whether or not moviegoers choose to pay to see a film in theatres, and yet the methods use to achieve scores for films by various aggregators tends to be poorly understood, so it’s easy to make a false assumption that a 70% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes should be understood as an average of all scores. This is not the case: Rotten Tomatoes “gives all positive reviews…a flat score of 1/1 and all negative reviews…a score of 0/1.”

Stop and think about that statement for a moment. A review of 5 stars, 4.5 stars, 4 starts, 3.5 stars, 3 stars, and 2.5 stars are all converted to a single point. However, an analysis of RT scores concluded the aggregator does not include the lowest possible rating of a 0.5 star review in it’s scoring algorithm. This means anyone who gives a film what is ostensibly the lowest possible score get excluded from the overall audience score.

A score anywhere between 1 and 2 stars is converted to zero, while 2.5 converts to a score of 1.

The RT algorithm strips away any question of, “How much did you like this film” and renders your score into a simple thumbs up / thumbs down evaluation, but it excludes the most negative reviews without being transparent about it.

The final RT audience score is a percentage of the reviews that were ‘positive’, while skewing data by blocking any zero star reviews and ignoring all the 0.5 star reviews.

A good question to ask might be, “Why?” And important factor to understand is that the parent company that owns Rotten Tomatoes is Fandango, a ticket-selling company owned by another company that happens to own production companies like Warner Brothers.

Should we be suspicious of review aggregators? There’s is an argument to be made for great writers who love cinema and can articulate why or when a film is worth seeing.